Waiver of the Requirement To Use Weighted Averages in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs
This final rule makes a technical change to the regulations governing the nutrient analysis of meals served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Program regulations require school food authorities to use “weighted averages” for nutrient analysis of their school meals. Under this method, the nutrient content of school meals is measured (weighted) according to the quantity of food items chosen by students. This final rule extends, until September 30, 2009, the waiver for conducting a weighted nutrient analysis. This rule responds to changes made under the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004 and is intended to provide school food authorities with additional time to gain operational experience with nutrient analysis.
Table of Contents
- Executive Order 12866
- Regulatory Flexibility Act
- Public Law 104-4
- Executive Order 12372
- Federalism Summary Impact Statement
- Executive Order 12988
- Paperwork Reduction Act
- Government Paperwork Elimination Act
- Public Participation
- Civil Rights Impact Analysis
For further information contact: ↑
Ms. Rosemary O'Connell, Section Chief, School Programs Section, Policy and Program Development Branch, Child Nutrition Division, Food and Nutrition Service at 703-305-2635.
Supplementary information: ↑
Section 110 of the Child Nutrition and WICReauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-265) amended section 9(f)(5) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, 42 U.S.C. 1758(f)(5), by waiving, until September 30, 2009, the requirement that school food authorities (SFAs) planning menus using nutrient standard menu planning conduct a weighted analysis of all foods offered to children as part of their reimbursable meals. A weighted nutrient analysis is based on the nutrient and calorie levels that each menu item selected contributes to the reimbursable meal. This requirement derives from the School Meal Initiative for Healthy Children, a comprehensive plan that focuses on the nutrient content of the school meals to ensure that children get the key nutrients and calories needed for their well-being. In the lunch program, this requirement is set forth at 7 CFR 210.10(i)(5)(i); in the breakfast program it is located at 7 CFR 220.8(e)(5)(i).
Prior to Public Law 108-265, the National School Lunch Program regulations under 7 CFR 210.10 and 7 CFR 220.8 waived compliance with the weighted averaging requirement until September 30, 2003. The ending date for the waiver was extended through Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) guidance in response to several Continuing Resolutions prior to enactment of Public Law 108-265.
Through Public Law 108-265, Congress re-instated the waiver until September 30, 2009 in response to concerns about costs and complexity from program sponsors. However, weighted analysis is still considered a more accurate method for doing nutrient analysis of school meals because it is based on the actual number of each menu item selected by children, rather than simply being an average of the nutrients in an equal number of items included in the school menu.
The waiver extension applies to all SFAs using nutrient analysis, as well as to State agencies conducting independent analysis as part of their ongoing review of schools' compliance with the Federal nutrition standards. The provision does not prohibit State agencies from requiring schools to use weighted averages when doing nutrient analysis, nor does it prohibit State agencies from using weighted averages when doing nutrient analyses as a part of nutrition reviews of schools using food-based menu planning systems. Weighted analysis enables State agencies to provide well-targeted guidance on any nutrition improvements needed in a school menu.
Executive Order 12866 ↑
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act ↑
This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Roberto Salazar, Administrator of the Food and Nutrition Service, has certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Additionally, the Department of Agriculture does not anticipate any adverse fiscal impact on local schools.
Public Law 104-4 ↑
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA, FNS must generally prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with “Federal mandates” that may result in expenditures to State, local or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires FNS to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus, this final rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372 ↑
The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the School Breakfast Program (SBP) are listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.555 and No. 10.553, respectively. These programs are subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. State agencies, local program sponsors, and NSLP and SBP advocates had the opportunity to provide input during reauthorization of the child nutrition programs.
Federalism Summary Impact Statement ↑
Executive Order 13132 requires Federal agencies to consider the impact of their regulatory actions on State and local governments. Where such actions have federalism implications, agencies are directed to provide a statement for inclusion in the preamble to the regulations describing the agency's considerations in terms of the three categories called for under section (6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132. FNS has considered the impact of this rule on State and local governments and has determined that this rule does not have federalism implications. This rule does not impose substantial or direct compliance costs on State and local governments. Therefore, under section 6(b) of the Executive Order, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988 ↑
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have preemptive effect with respect to any State or local laws, regulations or policies which conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect unless so specified in the Effective Date paragraph of the final rule. Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the application of its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures must be exhausted.
Paperwork Reduction Act ↑
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chap. 35; see 5 CFR part 1320) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve all collections of information by a Federal agency before they can be implemented. Respondents are not required to respond to any collection of information unless it displays a current valid OMB control number. This rule does not contain information collection requirements subject to approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act ↑
FNS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires government agencies to provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible. The waiver extension implemented through this regulation does not require compliance with the GPEA.
Public Participation ↑
This action is being finalized without prior notice or public comment under authority of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A) and (B) to quickly implement the waiver extension granted by the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004. Thus, the Department of Agriculture has determined in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Opportunity for Public Comments is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest and, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), finds that good cause exists for making this action effective without prior public participation.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis ↑
FNS has reviewed this final rule in accordance with the Department Regulation 4300-4, “Civil Rights Impact Analysis,” to identify any major civil rights impacts the rule might have on children on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability. After a careful review of the rule's intent and provisions, FNS has determined that it does not affect the participation of protected individuals in the National School Lunch Program.
List of subjects ↑
Food and Nutrition Service, Grant programs-education, Grant programs-health, Infants and children, Nutrition, Penalties, Reporting and record keeping requirements, School breakfast and lunch programs, Surplus agricultural commodities.
Food and Nutrition Service, Grant programs-education, Grant programs-health, Infants and children, Nutrition, Reporting and record keeping requirements, School breakfast and lunch programs.Accordingly, 7 CFR Parts 210 and 220 are amended as follows:
Part 210—national school lunch program ↑1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 210 continues to read as follows:
42 U.S.C. 1751-1760, 1779.§ 210.10 2. In § 210.10: a. The last sentence of paragraph (i)(5)(i) is amended by removing the year “2003” and adding in its place the year “2009”. b. The last sentence of paragraph (l)(4)(viii) is amended by removing the year “2003” and adding in its place the year “2009”.
Part 220—school breakfast program ↑1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 220 continues to read as follows:
42 U.S.C. 1773, 1779, unless otherwise noted.§ 220.8 2. In § 220.8: a. The last sentence of paragraph (e)(5)(i) is amended by removing the year “2003” and adding in its place the year “2009”. b. The last sentence of paragraph (h)(3)(viii) is amended by removing the year “2003” and adding in its place the year “2009”. Dated: November 24, 2004. Roberto Salazar, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.